In the spirit of inviting folks to interact with my blog and hopefully improving my writing, I'm going to step out of my comfort zone and try something new.
Below, I've posted my first-ever official attempt at science writing that I prepared last fall as a journalism class assignment. I'd like to invite readers to provide their critical review. What do you like or dislike? How is the lead? The structure? The quotes? Does it keep your attention? Does it provide sufficient and/or appropriate detail? Etc. etc.
While this is partially a self-serving attempt to generate feedback, I hope the article (which wasn't published elsewhere) makes for interesting and useful reading.
But first, a little background...
The idea for this experiment struck me after reading a post by Anne Jefferson over at Highly Allochthonous (which I thoroughly enjoyed) about what scientists and journalists can learn from each other regarding how to write effectively about science for a broader, not-necessarily-expert audience. The inspiration for her post, in turn, was the publication of two news pieces* in a recent issue of Nature that discussed two just-published studies** (in the same issue of Nature) linking a greater probability of extreme weather, specifically above-average rainfall and flooding, to anthropogenically-induced climate change.
Showing posts with label science writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science writing. Show all posts
27 February 2011
26 January 2011
A plea for more science coverage in local and community papers
Last week’s Isthmus (January 21, 2011) cover story, which ran under the provocative headline, “The Truth about Adult Stem Cells,” set my mind racing for the better part of an hour as I considered various arguments that swirl around the stem cell debate. (For those that aren’t familiar with it, Isthmus is a weekly local paper in Madison, WI.) I, like a lot of people it seems, have an opinion, albeit a murky one, on the subject. Although I have no intention of sharing it here. I know better than to wade too quickly into a sure quagmire. Plus, that’s not what this post is about.
After that initial hour or so the other day, my mind settled back down and I was able focus on other concerns. But the article stuck with me. I came back to it today, reread it, read the ensuing online commentary, and began the debate all over again in my head.
At some point, it dawned on me how effective the story had been—whether through solid writing, or because of the subject matter, or both—at holding my attention and causing me to weigh the issue. It also got me thinking about how rare it is to find coverage of important scientific issues in local and community newspapers (i.e., circulation under about 50,000).
19 January 2011
Allow myself to introduce...myself
Hello dear reader,
Thank you for stopping by to check out my new blog, ‘+/- Science.’ It is intended as a general interest science writing blog, although the content will no doubt be colored by my own scientific interests—geoscience, chemistry, biochemistry and the like—and it may occasionally include posts that do not have an obvious connection to science. (Although, in my opinion, connections to science, or at least the scientific method, can be found almost everywhere.)
A brief introduction…
My name is Tim Oleson. Nice to meet you. [imaginary handshakes]
After spending a decade or so in science as a student and researcher, I’m transitioning to science writing. Currently pursuing a Master’s degree in journalism at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (Go Bucky!), I was formerly a grad student in the Department of Geoscience, also at UW, where I completed an MS in 2005 and a PhD in 2009 while conducting research in the field of biogeochemistry (yes, that’s an actual field). I never imagined myself as a career student, but that’s clearly how it turned out. Please check out the About the Author page, if you’re interested in learning a little bit more about me.
Purpose of the blog…
I recently overheard an undergraduate say, while speaking to a classmate, that he tries to avoid real science as much as possible. The two were discussing classes they had taken, or had considered taking, to fulfill university science requirements as painlessly as possible.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)